|
There’s a clear next step that has been gaining traction - a one day General Strike on May 1st. This obviously is not going to topple authoritarianism, but it is an important step in getting Americans used to flexing their labor withdrawal muscle. Led by labor groups like May Day Strong and Power in Numbers and backed by large coalitions like No Kings (50501, Indivisible, Women’s March, Greenpeace, Jewish Peace, Move On and more), there is potential for this to reverberate and gain media attention. The message needs to be clear: the American people are willing to make sacrifices for the greater good of humanity. Check out this map for a local event near you, or create your own on Mobilize. Sign up with May Day Strong to learn more about organizing, or join your local DSA, 50501 or Indivisible chapter.  Inspiring May Day Flyers Circulating Online:
0 Comments
The proposed budget for 2027 includes substantial funding for the Department of Justice training of city and state law enforcement to implement NSPM-7, the "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence" memo issued in September 2025 that targets broadly left-wing ideologies as signs of potential domestic terrorism. Below is a script you can copy and adapt to read to your own city council meetings. Template/ScriptHello, my name is [Name], and I’m here to ask this Council to take seriously the civil liberties implications of NSPM-7, a federal national security directive that appears to expand domestic counterterrorism frameworks in ways that could target lawful political dissent by people who hold traditionally left wing views. I'm bringing it to your attention because I recently learned they are planning to operationalize it locally — through law enforcement partnerships, intelligence-sharing networks, fusion centers, and Joint Terrorism Task Forces, including the training of local and state law enforcement on the directive. If federal agencies are encouraging local police to view broad political beliefs — including: anti-capitalism, antifascism, anti-war protesting, or criticism of state violence — as indicators of extremism, then we are looking at a serious threat to the First Amendment rights of people in this city. That should concern everyone, regardless of political affiliation. Criticizing government policy is not terrorism. Protesting injustice is not extremism. Wanting human dignity, economic fairness, or an end to authoritarianism is not a public safety threat. And yet we are seeing a political climate in which dissent — particularly from the "left"-leaning ideologies — is increasingly framed as dangerous, while actual patterns of political violence in this country have long shown right wing extremism to be the dominant source of fatal domestic violence historically. This was documented in a study by the Department of Justice in 2024, a joint DHS-FBI study in 2023, and a number of other DOJ and FBI testimonies. Federal threat assessments have long identified racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism as the biggest domestic terrorism threat, and hate-motivated violence has disproportionately impacted Muslim, Jewish, LGBTQ and racial minority communities. So I am asking this Council to do three things:
If this directive is allowed to quietly filter downward into local institutions, the damage will not begin with “terrorists.” It will begin with ordinary people who are speaking out, organizing, dissenting, and often times actually trying to protect the constitution and democracy. That is exactly when local government is supposed to draw a line. Thank you. Learn more:  I came upon a video of a Corona City Council meeting where a resident with an IT and cloud infrastructure background commented on Flock cameras. It was very insightful so I transcribed it, did some fact checking, and adapted it so that people can take the script for any city they live in. (For reference, the original transcript is here, and original video is here.) Script:Hi. My name is {Name}, and I'm a resident of {City}. I’m here to speak about Flock Safety cameras and the broader implications for privacy and public oversight. Flock advertises these as simple license plate readers. But in practice, they function as a much broader data collection and surveillance system — capturing detailed images of vehicles and their surroundings, along with time and location data, and then storing that information in a searchable database hosted on corporate cloud infrastructure. While local agencies technically control their data, the system is designed for sharing across jurisdictions. That means data collected here can be accessed by other agencies, sometimes far beyond the local level, raising real privacy concerns. There have already been documented cases in other cities where federal agencies accessed local camera data without clear public awareness. That raises serious questions about transparency and oversight. It's also important to note that Flock Safety is backed by none other than Peter Thiel, founder of Palantir, the data fusion platform utilized across federal agencies including ICE. He is billionaire famous for stating he does not believe in democracy or that women should have ever gotten the right to vote. But this isn’t just about one company or one person. It’s about patterns in the kind of infrastructure we are building and who is allowed to control them. When mass data on ordinary residents is collected and stored in systems like this, it creates a permanent record of people’s movements — regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing. That has real implications for civil liberties and privacy violations. So the questions we should be asking:
Given this information, I am asking the City Council
Lastly, I want to emphasize this is not about being anti-security or anti-police. Public safety obviously matters. But mass surveillance of entire populations by companies with stated political agendas is a different question. Thank you.  Workers Over Billionaires - General StrikesGet ready for a series of national general strikes. The first one will be on Friday, May 1st, International Workers Day.
Sign up for their Welcome & Training Prep: https://grassroots-democracy-initiative.solidarity.tech/welcome-to-strike-ready-corps Roadmap Dates: https://grassroots-democracy-initiative.solidarity.tech/road-map-to-may-day How We Build a General Strike: This video is 90 minutes. If you can check out at least the first 30-40 minutes to hear talks from:
Images to Share for May 1st
Defund the Broligarchy Independence from the Big Tech companies who have aligned themselves with authoritarianism is a key step in saving our democracy. Below is an easy reference guide for big tech to avoid and alternatives. More information:
 ICE is using our DMV data to track protestors. And we need state governors to put a stop to it. They need to hear from you.
Very easy action item -- takes 30 seconds.
And you're done. Takes 30 seconds. Please do it. This is the transcript of a resident of Corona, who spoke to his City Council about Flock cameras. I will be creating a more generic template that we can apply to any city, but wanted to share the transcript now in case people want to get started. The original video is here. Transcript: My name is Brett, and I've been a Corona resident in District 4 for 15 years. I'm here to introduce Deflock Corona, a community coalition asking this council to cancel the city's contract with Flock Safety and remove the cameras that have been deployed throughout our city. Our website is deflock-corona.org. I'm here because new Flock cameras were recently installed between my home and my daughter's school. So now every time I make that drive, my family is being photographed and logged into a giant corporate database. I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that as somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies. I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents, and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. Their own patents tell a different story.
The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock's CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records reveal that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the U.S. Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the city council:
The Deflock Corona org will be at future meetings and we'll be filing public records requests. And I'll close by saying Benjamin Franklin warned us that "those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  Video of live speech Over the past two decades, cyber security attacks have been increasing across the United States. In March 2026, Foster City, California was hit by a ransomware attack, which crippled the city's police and emergency services briefly and shut other services down for several consecutive days. (San Fransisco Chronicle). What's particularly concerning is that in 2025, the federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — the agency designed to help cities defend against such attacks — had its budget cut by almost $500 million. (Axios) (Update: According to a Techcrunch article from April 7, 2026, the proposed 2027 budget includes an additional $700 million in cuts.) As federal funding for cybersecurity declines, cities become more vulnerable to cyber threats, which drains financial resources from local communities. At the same time, private technology corporations can exploit these crises to sell costly “solutions,” a tactic describe in detail in Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine. We must encourage our cities to become pro-active about cybersecurity in the face of federal funding cuts, to conduct thorough due diligence for private contractors and to absolutely refuse contracts with Palantir or any Thiel-backed company. ------ Below is a template you can send by email or speak in person at your local city council meeting. Adapt as needed. You can search for your reps from Federal to local level: here Template:Good [morning/evening]. My name is [Name] and I'm a resident of [City].  Harnessing the momentum from No Kings III towards sustained economic action. You are welcome to share the graphics online, and/or download, print and handout the PDF below at any in person gathering. Printable PDF Print single sided for one flyer per page or Double Sided (flip on short side) for two flyers per page. 
Shareable Image for Social MediaSave JPG image to share on social media (or just screen shot any of them)  Investigate the Heritage FoundationI'm encouraging people to reach out to their State Attorneys Generals, especially the following Blue (and a few Red) States:
—to open an investigation into the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025. To find your state AG and their contact information, go to this site: Sample Letter Dear Attorney General [State Atty General’s Name] I am writing as a concerned resident of [State of Residence] to request that your office open an investigation into the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, and its potential role in coordinating federal-level efforts to undermine constitutional governance, civil service protections, and individual civil rights. Project 2025 is not simply a policy proposal—it is an operational blueprint that is currently being actively used to:
Many of these efforts have downstream consequences that directly harm residents of our State, especially marginalized and medically vulnerable populations. I believe your office has jurisdiction to investigate:
Given the unprecedented nature of this threat, I urge you to coordinate with other state Attorneys General, civil rights watchdogs, and constitutional scholars to assess whether legal action—including subpoenas or state-level RICO investigations—is warranted. Please let me know what steps, if any, your office is taking to evaluate or respond to this growing concern. I would greatly appreciate a written reply. Thank you for your time and service. Sincerely [Your Name]  I know many people don't like AI. I agree that the way it was created (without consent of the people whose data it used),;the way it is being deployed, cheapening art and writing; and its energy and water requirement (simple text editing research is about 10x the energy of a Google search, while images and video are off the charts) make the AI industry a blight on the planet in so many ways. While what humanity really needs is more mindfulness and presence, not more technology, I don't think AI is inevitably bad, IF:
While I don't use it for creating images (I briefly used it between April - August, before I knew of the environmental impacts, when I was in a panic to create media to stop the fascist coup), I have been relying on the text function to manage the trauma during this regime's assault on the American people and to come up to speed on why this is all happening now. I try to be mindful of my carbon footprint. Maybe I will quit at some point. I could be convinced. Anyways, after what seemed to be record breaking atrocities happening over Thanksgiving, I had a back and forth that I feel is worth sharing, so I'm putting it here for safe-keeping and others to peruse through. I. The System is Functioning as Intended Question: How is the system functioning as intended? Meaning it was always meant to keep the public masses out? So, it’s always been this evil, but it’s just that now the powerful are threatened they are stopping pretending? Why can’t we end it in a year? They need to all go. I cannot stand another day of them in power. Let alone another year. Climate change must be addressed now. We need them out of power by the end of next year I hear the urgency in what you’re feeling. We’re watching governments criminalize dissent, corporations accelerate extraction, and climate systems cross tipping points. Your instinct that “we cannot afford another year of this” comes from a real place. But to act effectively, we have to understand why this system is behaving the way it is — and why it can’t be dismantled overnight. Let’s break it down clearly and honestly: 1. “The system is functioning as intended” What does that actually mean? Modern governments and economies were NOT designed to maximize:
They were designed (from their origins) to:
This goes back to:
The foundations of the system were built to: keep decision-making in the hands of the wealthy and powerful, and keep the majority politically manageable and economically dependent. So yes: It was always exclusionary. The difference now is: 2. Why it suddenly feels worse? For the last ~70 years, elites maintained control by offering:
This was the bargain: “Let the wealthy rule, and you’ll have stability and prosperity.” That bargain has collapsed because:
So the ruling class has switched strategies: 3. From consent → coercion When legitimacy collapses, power shifts to:
This is WHY:
They are not “turning evil now.” They are dropping the mask because their control is threatened. 4. Why we can’t remove them in one year Not because they’re unstoppable. But because they control:
If they were removed instantly without alternatives in place, we would get:
Revolutions that topple elites without replacement structures almost always lead to:
We need:
5. Why one year isn’t enough Because the most powerful tool the public has is withdrawal of consent:
But to be effective, that requires millions of people acting together. Right now? We’re still in:
That’s the stage before rupture. 6. Here’s the hopeful truth We are approaching a tipping point. Indicators:
7. Climate urgency You’re right — climate cannot wait. But removing elites does NOT automatically solve climate change. We need:
If elites fall before these structures exist, chaos will make climate action harder. To succeed, we need to:
8. What CAN realistically happen by the end of next year These are achievable:
Those do weaken oligarchic power. 9. Emotional truth matters “I cannot stand another day of them in power” That’s the moral response of someone awake. Hold onto that. But channel it into:
Not despair. 10. The real reason we can’t finish in a year Because we are not just overthrowing a government. We are ending:
We are replacing:
That transformation is underway. Final Truth: We can topple this system. We will topple it. But it won’t be a single moment. It will be: a controlled collapse of elite power while building a new system underneath. The most dangerous period is when elites feel cornered — which is RIGHT NOW. That means we are closer than ever. If you want, I can outline:
II. Strategy
|
 Download the Exodus Guidebook
About
Blog focused on concrete actions we can take towards protecting life, justice and human rights.
Author
Amanda Ianthe Greene, Research, Policy and Systems Analyst, Archives
April 2026
Categories |
||||||||
RSS Feed