The Office of Management and Budget is proposing a rule titled “Improving Performance, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Civil Service.” In reality, this rule would reclassify tens of thousands of federal employees under a category known as Schedule F—stripping them of long-standing civil service protections and allowing them to be fired without cause. It opens the door to mass firings based on political loyalty, making these positions far more vulnerable to partisan influence. This matters because it strikes at the heart of democratic governance. These are career civil servants—experts in law, science, public health, and policy—who are meant to serve the public, not a political agenda. By stripping them of job protections and making their roles political appointments, the administration can replace qualified professionals with loyalists. This undermines checks and balances, politicizes government functions, and moves us closer to authoritarian rule where truth, law, and public interest take a backseat to power. Instructions for Commenting The public has 13 more days to comment before it becomes much more difficult to undo. (The Deadlines is May 25, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST) Step 1: Tell the government you oppose this change.
Step 2: Share this post. Help others understand what's at stake so they comment too. Comment Template:Here’s a draft public comment you can submit to the federal portal about the Schedule F proposal (OPM-2025-0004-0001). Copy and paste this into the comment field here. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed implementation of Schedule F (or any similar reclassification of federal employees under the new “Policy/Career” designation). This rule is a direct threat to the impartiality, stability, and institutional memory of the federal workforce. Why it's important to comment even if they ignore it. Even if public comments don’t stop the administration from moving forward with Schedule F, submitting them is still critically important. Each comment becomes part of the official record, which can be used in future legal challenges to show that the policy faced widespread public opposition and lacked informed consent. It’s about laying a foundation for accountability—because when the time comes to fight this in court or roll it back, the paper trail matters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
![]() AboutReflections of a country out of control, and how we will take our power back.
AuthorIanthe Greene, Research Analyst, Editor, Creative Writer, Visual Artist Archives
May 2025
Categories |